Title: Test them all, is it worth it? Assessing configuration sampling on the JHipster Web development stack
Authors: Axel Halin, Alexandre Nuttinck, Mathieu Acher, Xavier Devroey, Gilles Perrouin, Benoit Baudry
Publication: Springer Empirical Software Engineering, April 2019, Vol24
A group of software researchers, partially involved in the EU-funded STAMP project, has published interesting results based on configuration tests on JHipster, a popular open source application generator to create Spring Boot and Angular/React projects.
Abstract: Many approaches for testing configurable software systems start from the same assumption: it is impossible to test all configurations.
This motivated the definition of variability-aware abstractions and sampling techniques to cope with large configuration spaces. Yet, there is no theoretical barrier that prevents the exhaustive testing of all configurations by simply enumerating them if the effort required to do so remains acceptable. Not only this: we believe there is a lot to be learned by systematically and exhaustively testing a configurable system. In this case study, we report on the first ever endeavour to test all possible configurations of the industry-strength, open source configurable software system JHipster, a popular code generator for web applications. We built a testing scaffold for the 26,000+ configurations of JHipster using a cluster of 80 machines during 4 nights for a total of 4,376 hours (182 days) CPU time. We find that 35.70% configurations fail and we identify the feature interactions that cause the errors. We show that sampling strategies (like dissimilarity and 2-wise):
(1) are more effective to find faults than the 12 default configurations used in the JHipster continuous integration;
(2) can be too costly and exceed the available testing budget. We cross this quantitative analysis with the qualitative assessment of JHipster’s lead developers.
Read the full article on Springer website